Archive for March, 2009

Interactive Marketing Associations Busy Interacting – Even About Ad Exchanges

Sunday, March 29th, 2009

Interactive Marketing AssociationsMany regional interactive marketing associations are busy with panels and symposia about digital marketing strategy and tactics – even exchanges!

The Atlanta Interactive Marketing Association (AIMA – Facebook link) provided a panel to its members on ad networks and exchanges this past week that included Google and Yahoo!. Upcoming, on April 8, the IAB comes to Atlanta for a discussion of the organization’s latest initiatives and challenges. Presenters include Peter Conti, Senior Vice President, Borrell Associates, Paul Iaffaldano, EVP and GM of The Weather Channel and Steve Shaw, Senior Vice President, Cox Cross Media.

(more…)

Ad Network Vizi Catches Publisher's Ad Serving Fraud on Video

Friday, March 27th, 2009

Vizi Ad Network Catches Publisher FraudAfter complaints about malware and pornographic ads on its network, Vizi came out with a video yesterday which addresses publisher fraud. As you may recall, Vizi claims that ad network Oridian was serving unwanted pornographic ads via the Right Media Exchange, but has since cut Oridian loose from its network chain.

Ad Operations Online’s Otilia Otlacan has chronicled the ongoing drama as her company’s site has been on the receiving end of the destructive and/or embarassing ads.

(more…)

Ad Network Vizi Catches Publisher’s Ad Serving Fraud on Video

Friday, March 27th, 2009

Vizi Ad Network Catches Publisher FraudAfter complaints about malware and pornographic ads on its network, Vizi came out with a video yesterday which addresses publisher fraud. As you may recall, Vizi claims that ad network Oridian was serving unwanted pornographic ads via the Right Media Exchange, but has since cut Oridian loose from its network chain.

Ad Operations Online’s Otilia Otlacan has chronicled the ongoing drama as her company’s site has been on the receiving end of the destructive and/or embarassing ads.

(more…)

BlueKai and eXelate Ad Data Exchanges Featured

Thursday, March 26th, 2009

Behavioral Targeting, BlueKai and eXelate in The New York TimesBlueKai and eXelate hit the PR jackpot today with a feature article in the NY Times. Though the article written by Stephanie Clifford ends with a thud, it hits on a core reason exchanges exist and expand today. Clifford quotes BlueKai CEO, Omar Tawakol, saying, “People are realizing that it’s the data that drives the value.”

Data drives value – the exchange value proposition in a nutshell. The value is enabled by transparency and control of the exchange model. But for the consumer and congressman reading the article, it will likely be another reminder about privacy and that we need to “watch out for those tricky technology guys.”

Clifford differentiates BlueKai and eXelate saying that eXelate goes beyond selling eCommerce cookie data to include publisher registration data.

(more…)

Contextweb Takes On Vibrant Media, Kontera With In-Text Ads

Thursday, March 26th, 2009

Expanding its toolkit for publishers, Contextweb announced today that it will make available in-text ads for publishers on the Adsdaq exchange beginning March 31. Leveraging its contextual technology, Contextweb will enter the same space which Vibrant Media and Kontera have dominated in the recent past in a battle-contextual-royale.

Contextweb’s Jay Sears explains how in-text ads will work on their company blog:

“ContextWeb publishers participating in the In-text program will see specific keywords double underlined within their content. Upon mouse-over of the keyword, the end-user will have the option to see and click on ads. The ads are specifically relevant to the keyword that has been double underlined, which enables advertisers to be precise in their targeting. As a publisher, you will be able to name a CPC AskPrice for all the in-text ads served to your account. No additional tagging or integration is required.”

(more…)

Digitas, Media Contacts, Razorfish Talk Ad Exchanges At Search Engine Strategies

Wednesday, March 25th, 2009

Search Engine Strategies 2009 NYCToday, Day 2 of Search Engine Strategies NYC, featured a collection of agency executives who discussed the current online display advertising market in a panel titled, “Pardon My Reach: A Snapshot of the Display Ad Marketplace.”

With AdExchanger.com’s focus on ad exchanges, this was an opportunity to learn about agency opinion and innovations as it related to ad exchanges.

For now, it appears agencies see ad exchanges, at best, as little more than an opportunity to retarget in the broadest sense, and suggest that clients remain queasy about the new, transparent marketplace.

The panel was moderated by ClickZ Managing Editor, Zach Rodgers and included:

As the hour long panel, crisply led by Zach Rogers, turned to the subject of ad networks and exchanges, Sarah Baehr from Razorfish suggested that there were too many ad networks and not enough of a differentiation, adding:
(more…)

Cloudy Computer Future Is Good For Ad Exchanges

Tuesday, March 24th, 2009

Ad Exchanges and Cloud ComputingToday’s announcement that Steve Perelman’s OnLive may have potentially disintermediated game console providers has the blogosphere a-chirping.

The company has created a new compression which allows data used for online game services to be computed on distant servers – cloud computing servers – instead of through a game console or speedy, local computers. 

Considering the future of ad exchanges, the cloud architecture makes sense as expensive infrastructure is “outsourced” to cloud computing specialists such as AppNexus, Amazon EC2, GoGrid, EMC and others who can provide the exchange backbone and enable data providers of targeting, analytics and more for ad traders on the exchange.

(more…)

The OPA Agenda: Declare War on the Long Tail and Blogs

Monday, March 23rd, 2009

Search Engine Results BrouhahaFrom Today’s AdAge article, “Media Giants Want to Top Google Results” by Nat Ives:

“You should not have a system,” one content executive said, “where those who are essentially parasites off the true producers of content benefit disproportionately.”

Load the cannons! Kiss the loved ones goodbye! This is WAR!

Premium publisher titans undoubtedly led by the stealthy Death Star of Demagoguery known as the OPA (Online Publishers Association) have inadvertently declared war on bloggers by suggesting to Google that their content is better and deserves better rankings on Google search engine result pages (SERPs).

(more…)

Google Advertising Strategy: All Your Exchange Are Belong To Us

Monday, March 23rd, 2009

Google Search Retargeting for the Ad ExchangeIt’s coming.

It’s the second Google “killer app” after search advertising.

It’s Google’s advertising exchanges! – the exclusive location for Google Search retargeting as long as Big G can survive the privacy tidal wave.

The Evolution of the Killer App

A long time ago, in an ad world far, far away…

For many years, Google advertisers and publishers have benefited from Google’s contextual targeting technology which has been broken out in two ways via Google’s AdWords advertising app: Search and Content.

For the advertiser using Search, they get to target keywords and phrases relevant to their audience and bid for placement of their very own text display ad next to the organic results on the SERP (search engine results page).

Search is closer to the end of the purchase funnel and often is the last place a user goes before an “action” (e.g. a purchase) and has shown phenomenal results in comparison to display ads on general interest websites. Publishers have been able to share in Google’s blackbox revenue share from Search by enabling the AdSense network’s custom Google Search for their websites.

Important: there is a finite amount of display ad inventory in search.

(more…)

Air and Liquid: Social Media and Ad Exchanges

Thursday, March 19th, 2009

Considering the glacial migration towards premium AND remnant inventory exchanges by the online ad industry, the attributes of social media and ad exchanges have a lot in common these days aside from the fact that social media display ad inventory is unloaded through exchanges. Whether we want to admit it or not, both mediums prominent roles in the digital economy lie ahead.

Below is the final slide of Charlene Li of Altimeter Group’s recent presentation, “The Future Of Social Networks,” at SXSW 2009 (covered here by Louis Gray), as she prognosticates about the social future.

charlene-li-social-media


And now, the same slide edited with AdExchanger’s golden touch and speaking to ad exchanges.

Social Media and Ad Exchanges


Social media and ad exchanges are rapidly growing models that enable consumers and companies, respectively, to create their own networks (blocks of actionable media in the case of ad exchanges). Neither is making beaucoup dollars at the moment whether for the social destination and exchange owners or their participants – the exception being aggressive direct response/CPA advertisers running strong amidst abundant and inexpensive inventory of – social ad media on the exchanges!

In social media, web properties such as Facebook and Myspace enable users to create unique and meaningful networks of friends, applications and even brands that best reflect each individual’s world. In the future, these networks will become as important as “air” with effortless portability of personal information, Li suggests. Life doesn’t move online (totally), but it gets managed online.

Likewise, buyers, sellers and technology companies using the modular architecture of the advertising exchange will enable the aggregation of blocks of media with relevant audiences across the exchange. Here, liquidity will be the essential element – the final capitulation by all parties. Liquidity is life for the ad exchange.

Drinking The Liquidity of Ad Exchanges

The increasingly liquid exchange will add value to online display advertising inventory beyond the functionality of an ad server with an open auction attached.

Insight into media through the vast, shared, data mining technology of the exchange will offer the end game to ad traders of online media: competition for inventory (improving yield for publishers) and opportunity for advertisers (improving ROI).

In social media, new ways to deliver value for advertisers and publishers are being refined whether using behavioral, contextual or other data-driven processes. Yesterday’s pronouncement by RBC analyst, Ross Sandler, regarding Facebook eventually overtaking Google in uniques is no joke. Social media is the ultimate aggregator of humans. The revenue model is still ahead and inevitable.

Ironically, the evolution of the online ad display exchange marketplace will be an important part of what unlocks value for social media tomorrow as exchanges are able to reveal the “premium” in the “remnant.”

Ad Exchange News Links for Wednesday, March 18

Wednesday, March 18th, 2009

Ad Exchange News LinksIt’s been a while since we served up linkage. So, here we go – ad exchange-related news.

Financial Times writer, John Gapper, says that skepticism reigns regarding online ad exchanges – only for the uninformed, John. But, opposing viewpoints are always welcome here at AdExchanger.com. Apparently, big brands and newspaper sites may “shun” the advertising exchange model.

For you stock pickers, ValueClick, an ad exchange and network company, is now looking good as a stock market “buy” according to Seeking Alpha and financial analyst, Bernstein. Ad-related companies WPP Group and Publicis are also mentioned as hot stock properties. Boo-yeah.

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (greatest name for a newspaper) has gone digital and announced that it will not only be selling display through Yahoo! for seattlepi.com, but also selling Yahoo!’s and other digital partners’ advertising tools – or as Seeking Alpha put it: “aggregating services for local advertisers to prove out a new business model entirely.” Take note: that’s a publisher-as-an-agency – kinda like what we’re saying. Everybody’s going to be buying and selling on the exchange.

More from Erik Sass of MediaPost on newspaper’s “expanding digital platforms.” And, the Charlotte Observer reports it will be on Yahoo’s APT Platform in April.

Emily Steel of The Wall Street Journal covers talks about WPP Group and Google’s efforts to move forward with engagement mapping or attribution initiatives to help advertisers understand ad effectiveness online and in traditional environments. The $4.6 million investment by both companies sounds like an angel round. (No WSJ subscription? Try MediaPost.) With the nation’s top universities involved, too, hopefully the brainiacs can come up with an interesting case study or two that will encourage advertisers to move more budget online.

Burst Media launched its “AdConductor Inventory Exchange.” Whoa, did somebody say “exchange”? Why, yes. The new Burst-flavored exchange “offers advanced demographic and geographic targeting capabilities and additional audiences for remarketing and retargeting” among other features. More aerodynamic graphics on the AdConductor site.

Future Ad Exchange: The Media Profile

Tuesday, March 17th, 2009

For the ad exchange model, liquidity and scale are factors in determining price for media. And, of course, so is data.

Today, behavioral impressions are bought and sold, contextual impressions are bought and sold, etc. In the future, among several ways to trade advertising, including online display advertising, we suggest the “media profile” value.

Media Profile and Ad Exchanges


The data of the media profile offers buyers and sellers a way to understand value and overlays the auction much the way trading programs do in the stock exchange today. It isn’t something which sets or establishes a price on the exchange – but informs it.

Now, don’t worry Wenda-lovers, this doesn’t mean that media turns to pork bellies as creative will remain a critical wildcard in the process. Once again technology is a media buyers AND sellers best friend as it delivers intrinsic media value.

With the media profile, buyers and sellers can value a single impression according to a perceived value difference in a behavioral and contextual targeting opportunity, for example. Rather than bidding according to value for particular data streams, buyers will be offering pricing and sellers will be able to offer and set pricing using a more holistic approach that the real-time technology of the open exchange can enable.

Diggin’ into the Deets of the Media Profile

A Lookery or Exelate feed could inform the media profile using historical data regarding behavioral value using data from similar behavior media and predict future outcomes. Other filters such as demos, buying habits, could provide the buyer and seller additional ways to offer and set price, respectively.

For the contextual component, Lucid Media or Contextweb could offer a data feed to the Media Profile regarding historical performance for particular content categories – again with filters to look at ways to meet audience goals for the advertisers and yield goals for the publisher.

And so on.

Media profile is not a standard but a concept that through the evolution of the exchange will make sense as massive amounts of data can offer insight to advertisers, publishers and ad traders looking for inefficiencies in the marketplace.

Whether future (reserved) or spot inventory, buyers and sellers will be able to aggregate their own media profile through various data feed providers, or through one data provider who aggregates all the feed. Certain data streams will be proprietary, too, and allow exchange players to have advantage over others.

As the online advertising exchange evolves beyond scale and remnant inventory to the point where each impression can potentially be premium inventory, understanding the media profile will be critical.

Large Publishers Swarm as Pubmatic Premier and Funding Arrives

Monday, March 16th, 2009

Pubmatic Announce New Large Publisher ToolsToday’s Media Post reports that yield optimizer, Pubmatic, led by CEO Rajeev Goel, is providing new tools to large publishers which he says already comprises 80% of the inventory among the 5,500 Pubmatic publishers.

From Media Post’s Mark Walsh:

PubMatic Premiere is aimed at publishers with more than $5 million in annual online revenue, and promises to give them greater control over advertising served via ad networks to help protect their brands and boost ad revenues.

More interesting is this:

In addition to providing on-the-fly optimization in allocating inventory among ad networks, the new platform provides large publishers with a dashboard to monitor ad quality and latency in ad serving. PubMatic co-founder and CEO Rajeev Goel said the company also tracks ad quality proactively based on a publisher’s ad creative requirements (such as banning alcohol or gambling-related ads) and broader industry trends.

MediaPost points to recent “belly fat” ads as potential problems that the new tool solves for publishers that are concerned the blubbery images don’t work with their brand.

In any event, Pubmatic is putting more and more tools in the hands of exchange members as when they announced that ad networks could start buying from their publishers two weeks ago and, now, large publishers can use tools to filter the advertising they want served.

Ad exchanges provide control to publishers and a tool like Pubmatic’s appears to be a great step. As AdMeld, Yieldex, YieldBuild, Rubicon Project and Pubmatic evolve, it will be interesting to see if they may become exchanges unto themselves – diabolical! After all, they are providing an open platform to buyers and sellers.

Pubmatic Premier


Pardon Me, Is That A Cash Infusion?

A second round of funding has also arrived at Pubmatic which included investors Draper Fisher Jurvetson (DFJ), and Nexus India Capital and Helion Ventures, according to the San Jose Business Journal. Pubmatic’s last round closed in January 2008 to the tune of $7 million and, at the time, had only 1,500 publishers.

The new funding, whose total was unannounced, will allow the company to open sales offices in New York and Europe according to the announcement.

The Disintermediation of Ad Agencies

Friday, March 13th, 2009

The Disintermediation of Ad AgenciesDarren Herman of MDC Partners‘ Varick Media Management recently published his thoughts on the disintermediation of online display advertising and, by extension, ad networks.

Though it cannot be said we’re in complete agreement, it is a well-conceived argument that plots a path to success for savvy ad agencies who are ready to bring ad exchange technology and thinking to their media buying.

Unfortunately, most agencies will not follow Darren and MDC’s path. And, clients, networks and technology providers will realize that the expertise of the exchange trader has been largely dismissed, if not reviled, by their former agency partners. (For proof, just go to an IAB event to hear the vitriol sometime.)

Oddly, many agencies appear annoyed by the prospect that technology can affect their futures and, most importantly, their margins, which agencies are accustomed to taking for granted.

Agency stubbornness in maintaining proprietary, walled garden strategies will create the next big change in digital media buying: ad networks will bring their expertise, service and technology directly to clients who are looking for a bigger bang for their marketing dollar with the transparency and control of the exchange.

(more…)

Oh, Behave: Google Targets Behavioral Advertising and Privacy

Wednesday, March 11th, 2009

google-behavioral-targetingGoogle is interested in your interests.

The Google monolith announced today that its next option for advertisers will include behavioral targeting, and Miguel Helft of the NY Times wisely posits that the acquisition of DoubleClick and its technology is becoming more visible in Google strategy.

From “Google’s Official Blog,” Susan Wojcicki, VP, Product Management, writes:

At Google, we believe that ads are a valuable source of information — one that can connect people to the advertisers offering products, services and ideas that interest them. By making ads more relevant, and improving the connection between advertisers and our users, we can create more value for everyone.

Man, they’ve got some serious “keywords” over there.

You wanna make more money, Big G – who are you kidding? There’s nothing wrong with makin’ coin, but the holier-than-thou-shalt-do-no-evil attitude tastes saccharine from here.

Careful of My Privacy

This is another big step for the world’s largest collector of personal data and cannot be ignored by anyone. And, as usual, the media is enjoying the discussion around privacy and providing little insight other than Congress or other governmental agencies will be riding into town looking for behavioral renegades because, evidently, free content grows on the Internet’s trees.

All Things Digital’s Peter Kafka stirs the pot with a portrait of a smiling, Virginia congressman saying, “That’s Rick Boucher, a Democratic congressman from Virginia. And I’m pretty sure Google just ensured that you’re going to be seeing and hearing from him with some frequency.” Bold words, Peter.

It appears that Google is being pro-active and allowing users different configurations of opting-out for its behavioral advertising having created an Ad Preferences Manager and a plug-in which prevents deletion of a no-behavioral-ads cookie. It is difficult to imagine a user doing anything other than either accepting all behavioral ads or not through the new opt-out interface, which assumes users even go that far.

A big question is where is all this behavioral data coming from – exactly? Is it from search which is similar to the keyword and display ad retargeting recently announced by Yahoo!? Not yet.

The Google blog post offers an example of how its retargeting works with a user who has a cookie set in their browser while visiting the Google AdSense network, then visits an e-commerce sports site, and then is shown a display ad on the AdSense content network from an advertiser who wishes to target users with sports interests.

Searching for Behavior

Google is “leading” with behavioral targeting on its ad network, and figuring out privacy strategy, as the more important search retargeting will likely follow with even higher CPMs uncorking display advertising revenue on Google/DoubleClick’s Advertising Exchange AdEx and AdSense network (or do you say AdSense Exchange?).

Re-targeting search is the behavioral endgame as AOL’s 2006 data dump mishap proved. Google, as the industry’s leading advertising player, has to figure out a way to maintain user anonymity despite the identifiable nature of a behavioral search profile. (Think of the money being saved at smaller ad networks and exchanges for lawyers fees and… lawyers fees and… as Google leads the privacy battle.)

Content is not free. There will be compromise in Washington, and globally, as most users will understand that in allowing a cookie, he or she receives free content and cheaper products and services. It’s a healthy trade as long as the advertising industry offers controls to users to manage their personal information.

New OPA Display Ads to Help Ad Networks and Exchanges

Wednesday, March 11th, 2009

opa-display-advertisingThe Online Publishers Association has nobly decided to help the world of display advertising by introducing three, online display ad sizes.

Each new ad unit will be implemented and sold only through participating publishers’ direct sales teams later this year. Implicit is that ad networks and exchanges will not be selling these units.

Yeah, right.

Publishers, ad networks and advertising exchanges everywhere would be wise to start supporting these sizes ASAP for at least four reasons.

  • Advertisers will be looking to buy inventory for these sizes anywhere they can get acceptable ROI.
  • The new, enhanced units will be costly to make and advertisers will want to stretch their investment on creative dollars.
  • There will be unsold inventory and, rather than serving a house ad, at some point even large OPA publishers will be forced to turn to ad networks and exchanges no matter how much they want to avoid it.
  • Someday, these ad units will be sold through advertising exchanges right out of the gate – rather than through the direct sales team – as premium inventory slides over to the exchange.

OPA chief Pam Horan is quoted in the release, “Online Publishers Association Members Announce New Display Advertising Units,” as follows:

“‘Members of the OPA are offering a set of new principles and unique display advertising units to continue to foster innovation and leverage an environment that research has proven delivers better results for advertisers,’ said Pam Horan, president of OPA.”

$100 CPMs here we come!

Online Publishers Association Ad Unit
Artists rendering of
new, Online Publishers Association ad unit


The OPA continues to try to avoid the insight and power that technology provides in the advertising marketplace through exchanges and networks. We predict that selling premium impressions “direct only” will not yield efficient ROI for advertisers in the long run.

Among the initial group of web publishers set to test the new, larger banners sizes are: The New York Times, Reed Business Information, Bizjournals, BabyCenter, CBS Interactive, CNN, Condé Nast Digital, Discovery Communications, ESPN, Forbes.com, Bloomberg, BusinessWeek, FOXNews Digital, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Meredith Interactive, msnbc.com, IDG, iVillage Network, MTV Networks, Reuters, Time Inc., USA Today, NBC Universal, New York Media, Weather.com and The Wall Street Journal Digital Network.

The OPA offers four reasons of its own for the new ad sizes:

* Inspire creativity and high-quality advertising
* Provide a greater share of voice for the advertiser
* Introduce a measurement to capture impact
* Enhance interactivity to build user engagement with brands

Here the OPA has sided with recent noise from the Internet Advertising Bureau (IAB) suggesting that creativity, somehow, does not exist in current ad sizes. If it wasn’t for those gosh darned ad networks and exchanges which keep monetizing their unsold inventory, their CPMs would be so much better!

The three new ad sizes consist of functonality reminiscent of rich media providers PointRoll, Eyeblaster and Eyewonder:

  • The Fixed Panel – 336 wide x 860 tall.
  • The XXL Box – 468 wide x 648 tall, “which has page-turn functionality with video capability.”
  • The Pushdown – 970 wide x 418 tall, “which opens to display the advertisement and then rolls up to the top of the page.”

Look for the IAB to formally adopt these ads on their “list” of standard sizes in the near future as well.

Rob Hof’s article in BusinessWeek has a selection of juicy quotes from Martin Nisenholtz, former OPA chair and current SVP of NY Times Digital including: “The whole purpose of this is to map the quality of the creative [ad] to the quality of the sites. Part of the problem is that much of the Web is a sewer.”

Translation: The Long Tail sucks. Come spend here on our big portal, Mr. or Ms. Advertiser.

Trouble is, Marty, the Long Tail is now open to advertisers through behavioral and contextual targeting technology among others which efficiently aggregates online ad inventory at scale with reasonable and improving brand safety.

When is the OPA going to understand that technology is its member publishers’ best friend rather than worst enemy?

Answer: Not soon enough.

Web Publisher Tools for the Exchange: FireMeld from AdMeld

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

FireMeld Ad Operations Tool from AdMeldAmidst the mayhem of the current AdMonsters Publisher Forum in New Orleans which brings together ad operations professionals and their ad technology vendors comes news!

AdMeld, led by CEO Michael Barrett and founders Ben Barokas and Brian Adams, has released a new tool for client publishers.

AdMeld’s FireMeld enables the ad operations team of web publishers to view advertising media characteristics – such as network origin – and take action.

From the release:

“..you can use FireMeld to turn off an offending ad or send a pre-written note to AdMeld’s support team to take the appropriate action.”

A sample note (not provided by AdMeld) might read, “Holy smokes, AdMeld! Get the Adult Friend Finder ad off the bible study site before I lose my freaking job.”

In that its primary use is communication with the AdMeld account team, the Firefox plugin is available only to AdMeld clients.

From our perspective, and without having tested FireMeld, this tool is a next generation of the freeware Fiddler Web Debugging tool which has been widely available for a few years and allows users to track HTTP traffic. The key differences with FireMeld are integrated delivery management and communication.

Editor’s note: Making an AdMeld-branded, HTTP discovery tool available to the wider, web publishing public would make sense for AdMeld (or any yield optimization company) as part of a viral marketing campaign – presumably without the direct AdMeld communication features, etc.

FireMeld may not be a huge technological advancement, but it’s a clever “hook” for clients paying licensing fees who should enjoy seeing a bit of value-add from their investment. Anything yield optimization companies can do to enmesh themselves with their client’s day-to-day operations makes sense for ongoing customer relationship management.

The insight provided by the tool works well with the advertising exchange model as large, branded sites look to protect their pages from unwanted ads while benefiting from the real-time matching provided by yield optimizers such as AdMeld, Rubicon Project, PubMatic, Yieldex, YieldBuild and others.

Razorfish 2009 Outlook: The Ad Exchange Is Our Future

Monday, March 9th, 2009

Razorfish Digital Outlook Paper 2009 and Ad ExchangesAre those pork bellies or M&M’s in the picture?

Ad exchanges get premium billing in Razorfish’s just-released 2009 Digital Outlook paper (PDF here).

In the “What’s emerging” section of the paper, Razorfish has imbibed the ad exchange Kool-aid with a four-page spread entitled, “Ad Exchanges: Revolutionizing the Buy-Sell Process.”

The exchange feature is even before the mobile marketing profile. Shoot me now!

From the paper:

“With the four major portals all either acquiring or building ad exchanges in the last 18 months (Yahoo!’s Right Media, Microsoft’s AdECN, Google’s DoubleClick and AOL’s BidPlace), these platforms now have the scale and resources to transform the way digital ad inventory is bought and sold in2009 — and beyond.”

Well, that’s exactly right. Uh, er, except with its current lack of transparency, I’m not so sure you can call Platform-A’s BidPlace SB or the coming Pro version an ad exchange (Maybe that happens down the road?).

Nevertheless, the ad exchange model has arrived in wider, digital agency “thinking.”

Joanna O’Connell, Manager of Strategic Development, of Razorfish’s Ad Exchange Practice, evidently co-wrote the piece with Matt Greitzer, VP of Search and Josh Palau, Vice President, SEO, Global. Please note that the Search group at Razorfish is involved.

With exchanges’ focus on ROI and yield, it makes some sense that DR-types in the Search group would have input especially as Google (soon) and Yahoo! (sooner) begin to allow re-targeting of keyword search requests on their display ad networks and exchanges. This is a big opportunity in display advertising that few advertisers – or publishers, for that matter – seem to understand.

Search is closer to the end of the purchase funnel, remember? Re-targeting user intent will prove powerful and raise CPMs turning remnant inventory into premium.

Display advertising online is not dead and anybody that says so lacks an understanding of the power and technology of ad exchanges as display is morphing from the heady days of large publisher, premium inventory CPMs with little insight on performance.

In the final few paragraphs of the ad exchange feature, Razorfish takes a swing at exchange “threats.” Privacy is mentioned, as usual. Ok, fine. We think the ad exchange will find a way to mesh neatly with privacy concerns because the marketplace wants insight – but whatever… let’s talk about the other threat.

The other threat is a house of cards. Razorfish essentially sees branded, publisher vertical ad networks as capturing a significant slice of the advertiser pie.

Last year, ESPN turned its back on ad networks, while Turner Digital and Forbes started their own. The goal, in each case, was for the publisher to have complete control over its inventory and audience. Obviously, that may make them slow to adopt the exchange model as a viable source of revenue. If well-known, branded publishers shun the ad exchange channel, the future of ad exchanges could be limited.

Perhaps Razorfish is being deferential to the branded publishers from whom its partner agencies buy today. But, brand-safe inventory is and will be solved by exchange technology and controls.

As we have stated before, yes [ESPN], there have been problems with nefarious remnant inventory and advertisers infiltrating exchange models from time-to-time. It will happen again. But, the marketplace needs controls, and exchange technology providers will respond.

Consequently, there will be no better place than the open auction of the liquid exchange to monetize inventory.

If ESPN and a few others want to stand by the side of the road with a majority of their online display ad inventory, they will only hurt themselves as they learn that the market for their favorite form of reckless, attribution-free brand advertising is over.

Here are even cooler ideas (yeah, we said “cooler”!) for ESPN, Forbes and other similar pubs: grow to embrace the exchange model; learn how to trade; become experts at buying and selling inventory in your chosen vertical while continuing to provide integrated sponsorships with your direct sales team.

Schmidt on Google Ad Exchange; Yahoo! Premium Display Stabilizes

Wednesday, March 4th, 2009

Google Ad Exchange StrategyGoogle CEO Eric Schmidt made an appearance at the Morgan Stanley Technology Conference in San Francisco yesterday.

During the on-stage interview with Mary Meeker of Morgan Stanley, (a little) more information dribbled out on Big G’s ad exchange and display advertising strategy.

From CNN:

Schmidt also said the search advertising company has a good opportunity to apply the “Google magic” to the display advertising business. He noted that Google is in the process of building an online advertising exchange, replete with measurement tools that will help display properties figure out which ads to show where and when.

He also said display ads must evolve into rich, dynamic spots that have value to consumer. A third challenge for Google will be to build the business relationships with large advertisers.

Silicon Alley Insider was live blogging the event and captured the following:

“Where is next source of revenue? Next source is current business functioning better. Next and adjacent is a set of display businesses and an exchange being built from DoubleClick business. Display not uniform; Balkanized. By hand or poor quality spreadsheets in many cases; think we can work Google magic on that.”

And then later from SAI’s live blogging:

“What are 3 things that need to get done to get display to become part of business? First problem if you have a display property, multiple vendors building ad exchange. Heuristics are terrible. Standardization of ad formats. Need more. Especially around interactive and video ads. Future is an ad that brings you in, tells narrative. Best ads add real value. Video, story, narrative, etc. Third is construction of business relationship with large advertisers, which we’re still working on.”

All in all, it’s difficult to say that anything new was learned other than an ongoing focus by Google on the online display advertising business and that Schmidt believes the number of ad formats currently in play is ridiculous and needs to be standardized.

At this point, it’s too early too tell who offers the best exchange model – and, of course, liquidity is key – which is currently nothing compared to a year or two from now. It would seem likely that Google may take out a smaller player or two who offer compelling exchange technology.

But, more than likely, Google will attempt to step on everybody else and try to become the standard for ad exchanges bringing together their Google AdSense Exchange (which David Rosenblatt discussed at IAB), DoubleClick’s AdEx Ad Exchange and Google AdWords. Google wants to be THE exchange, of course.

Look for self-service access to a Google ad exchange arriving through APIs and an ASP model, a la AdWords, by year end. From Eric Schmidt’s comments, it appears that new analytics tools are in the offing as well which could help marketers and publishers gain further insight into their exchange, display ad buys as long as they’re willing to share their data with the Big G diablo.

To listen to Google CEO Eric Schmidt’s complete interview, click here.

Yahoo!’s Premium Display Ads Pricing Stabilizes

Meanwhile from The Wall Street Journal’s Digits blog comes word that premium display ad pricing is “showing signs” as Marv Albert would say.

…Yahoo’s chief financial officer Blake Jorgensen hinted at some promising economic news. Pricing on a major piece of Yahoo inventory – the graphical ads Yahoo sells with the guarantee they’ll appear in particular spots like the Yahoo homepage – has stopped sliding, he said. Those ads, which Yahoo calls “class one” inventory have been harder hit by the downturn than Yahoo’s class two inventory, which are cheaper ads that aren’t guaranteed to run on certain properties.

“We have seen our own class one stabilize through the fourth quarter,” said Jorgensen. Yahoo announced last week that Jorgensen will leave the company once his replacement is found.

Well, whaddya know? Good news in the world of online display advertising!

Click here to listen to Yahoo! at the Morgan Stanley Technology Conference.

Pubmatic Opens To Advertisers

Monday, March 2nd, 2009

Pubmatic Opens API to Ad NetworksThis news likely crossed under the radar for many but yield optimizer, Pubmatic, took another step forward into the exchange model by allowing ad networks open API access – the ability to buy from its network of website publishers.

To date, yield optimizers have served member publishers by aggregating, and then testing (sometimes may also be called “time series analysis”), participating ad networks for the best possible CPM. And publishers have responded as Compete.com shows consistent traction for yield optimizers AdMeld, Pubmatic and Rubicon Project in unique visitors through January 2009:

Yield Optimizers According to Compete com

Pubmatic offered the following in its release:

PubMatic said the move would also help ad networks expand ad targeting options and control over pricing and timing for campaigns. Higher quality campaigns and more targeted advertising would also help publishers better monetize their inventory.

This is another small, but important step for the ad exchange model as advertisers receive insight on media through the aggregation of shared publisher data by unique plug and play, exchange platform technology.