Archive for the ‘Ad Networks’ Category

Germany's AdScale Expecting Revenues To Double In 2010 Says CEO Pantke

Friday, February 19th, 2010

Matthias Pantke is CEO of AdScale GmbH, an online advertising marketplace based in Germany,

AdExchanger.com: Give us a bit of background on you and how it’s prepared you as well as the evolution of AdScale’s business model – which has been around for a few years, correct?

My career started at DSF in 1997 (the German equivalent of ESPN). In 2000, I joined the KirchGruppe in 2000 where I was responsible for the digital sales channels and the business development of (at that time) new business models like search, performance marketing or rights licensing. In 2005, I joined TradeDoubler, the European market leader for performance and affiliate marketing where I was responsible for the D-A-CH Market.

Today I am CEO of AdScale, Germany’s leading marketplace for online advertisement. Before I joined the company in January of 2008, I had already invested in AdScale at its beginning in April 2007 when the first financing took place. At that time, I consulted with one of the investors, Oliver Samwer, o. a. Founder of Ebay Germany and jamster. Already in 2004, I had noted early US-trading models and marketplaces with the objective of founding AdScale with the current investors. Due to the lack of market size and a missing fragmentation on the demand- and supply-side, we postponed it until April 2007.

From your standpoint, how is online display advertising different in Germany or Europe than in the U.S.?  And, any differences in the way exchanges and ad networks are viewed?

(more…)

Advertisers Overlaying Third-Party Data On Vertical Ad Networks Today Says Adify CEO Fradin

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

AdifyAdify released a survey of media planner and agencies today that looked at the importance of ad networks in online media buys and found that “branding has become the top priority for online campaigns as compared to direct response. Read the release.

CEO Russ Fradin spoke to AdExchanger.com about the results of the survey and audience buying as it relates to vertical ad networks.

AdExchanger.com: Your survey shows that targeting niche audiences remains a popular driver in using vertical ad networks (VANs). Are clients asking to buy audience more efficiently from vertical ad networks these days?

Vertical Ad Networks bring insight and expertise regarding the interests of their vertical’s audience as well as appropriate, quality, vertical-appropriate content. As consultative, premium sellers, Network Builders, using Adify’s Network Builder platform, overlay third party data sources easily if desired for the campaign.

That said, advertisers recognize that the right person in the right place at the right time is the winning combination. The data overlay helps specify the right person while the vertical ad network contributes to that identification as well as delivering the place and time.

AdExchanger.com: Can you see a day when vertical ad networks become vertical audience networks and begin corralling audience through exchanges, aggregators (yield optimizers) and networks to meet the scale requirements of a client’s particular audience? Or, is that a step too far for the VAN?

ComScore, Dynamic Logic and more have shown that consumers respond to compelling creative delivered at the right time and in the right place. There is no technology comparable to human expertise at identifying quality content and design. Exchanges and aggregators will play a significant role in reach and reinforcement of the message, but vertical ad networks create opportunities for branding, engagement and long term relationships between brands and their best prospects.

AdExchanger.com: If creative is “50 to 75 percent responsible for campaign success or failure” as you say in the release, how does or should a VAN help make creative more effective?

RF: The builders of vertical ad networks are subject matter experts who bet their brands, reputations and businesses on their understanding of their vertical and selection of quality, on-target publishers. Because of their relationship with the publishers and their insights into their markets, they can and do advise advertisers on how to speak with and engage targeted consumers. In this advisory role, Network Builders can “stack the deck” in selecting, tuning and delivering the most compelling creative to the most receptive audience.

By John Ebbert

Brand.net CEO Blair On Company's Video Initiatives And VAST

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

Brand.net announced on Monday that it is expanding beyond graphical display advertising and including video in its solution set. Read the release.

Brand.net CEO Elizabeth Blair discussed the company’s opportunity in online video advertising with AdExchanger.com.

Brand-netAdExchanger.com: Why do you see the VAST video standard as important for Brand.net as well as the industry as a whole?

EB: VAST is hugely important for Brand.net. We believe that media convergence is happening in a much faster and bigger way than even the ‘experts’ realize. It’s being driven by consumers who increasingly don’t see, want or need separate “online” and “offline” media. The monetization players, individually and increasingly as an industry, are making great strides in parallel to create solutions that reflect this new reality. VAST is a terrific example of that.

We’ve had no lack of desire, or customer demand, to extend into Video. But frankly, before VAST the market was a mess. Every publisher coded things differently, no real serving standards existed. Who has this benefitted? Format startups investing their time and money in some basic “adaptor” technology – an endless series of cords and plugs. Who has this hurt? Advertisers and publishers alike, near-completely beholden to a handful of fairly unsophisticated monetization providers.

We saw standardization coming, so rather than repeat others’ investments in basic plumbing we chose to (a) invest our money and time in technology that delivers on customer requirements across formats and (b) work with the industry to rapidly create and aggressively encourage adoption of a smart standard (VAST).

What is the “guarantee” part of Brand.net’s True Video Guarantee?

At Brand.net we treat our customers the way we want to be treated. We insist that people put things in writing for us – and then we both (a) make sure they deliver a report that they did what they said and (b) review it, and review the information independently, to make sure we got what we paid for. We do the same for our customers. So on Day 1 of offering our Video Advertising Solution, we issued our True Video GuaranteeTM. In addition to all our standard Display guarantees, we guarantee in writing clear treatment of the issues our customers told us were most critical, and most problematic, in the current online Video offerings. Specifically, our customers told us:

  1. They are tired of paying the steep CPMs for “pre-roll” and finding their ads running in-banner.
  2. They want to be in quality streaming environments.
  3. Video ad networks have been offering a surprisingly “tail focused” product.

Can brand marketers buy in real-time on the spot market? What are the challenges here?

Can they? You bet. Does doing so address their business and marketing objectives? No it does not. So the online media world of today – where the only option the DSPs and the vast majority of ad networks offer Brand marketers is “buy spot” – is a world where 94% of Brand spending remains offline.

Dan Ballister put it perfectly in his comment on a very insightful article from Michael Zimbalist at the New York Times:

“If [Brand] buyers are going after audiences in real-time auctions, will they make peace with having to forfeit control over ad environment and delivery predictability? What good is it to reach your audience when they don’t want to be found, or to only run 15% of your back-to-school campaign on time because you kept getting outbid?”

To bring their budgets online, Brand advertisers need a more effective approach. They need a forward market, built on top of the current spot market, with sophisticated page-level quality filtering; price and volume forecasting; buy automation; delivery management; and offline impact measurement.

By John Ebbert

Netmining Brings Profiling Solutions Through Ad Network Model Says GM Vegliante

Sunday, December 20th, 2009

Dean Vegliante is General Manager of Netmining, an online ad network and optimization company – and a division of Innovation Interactive which also owns SearchIgnite and 360i.

Dean Vegliante of NetminingAdExchanger.com: What problem is Netmining solving for its clients?

Netmining helps marketers drive significantly more revenue from their websites and online advertising. That’s the heart of what we do.

We also simplify the execution of online behavioral solutions with our Smart Tag. One simple Netmining tag in the footer of a marketer’s page can be used to deploy behavioral optimization across their website, email and display campaigns. Any future changes can be controlled by Netmining offsite, reducing the need for marketers to get their IT and website folks involved.

Who is your target market? Please describe your revenue model.

Netmining’s customers include some of the world’s leading digital agencies, as well as direct marketers, particularly in the automotive, retail, travel and B2B markets. Right now we find ourselves best suited to work with marketers who can tie us to a performance metric where we are consistently the best performer for customers like Red Roof Inn and Borders.

In terms of our pricing, we’re in a fortunate position because the rich data we collect and use in our algorithm provides us with the best performance in the space and thus allows us the flexibility to be open to different revenue models – CPA, CPM, rev share. We flourish in all of these models and work with clients to determine the best approach for them.

(more…)

InterCLICK Taps Markets For $12 Million; Pres Katz Says Ad Network Model Is Validated

Wednesday, December 16th, 2009

InterCLICKFresh from its move to the NASDAQ, InterCLICK announced that it has succesfully placed “2,875,000 shares of common stock to a select group of institutional investors.” Given the sale price of $4.50 share, InterCLICK now has a cool $12 million in net proceeds to play with. Acquisitions? More tech? Feet on the street? We’ll see. Read the release on Yahoo!.

AdExchanger.com caught up with InterCLICK president, Michael Katz…

AdExchanger.com: What does the investment mean for InterCLICK? And, can you characterize the openness to investment in advertising technology companies these days by investors? Market improving?

MK: This is a significant development for us and hopefully continues to validate the network model amidst other industry trends. Having access to significant capital (for the first time) will allow us to continue to deliver innovative solutions on behalf of our clients.

Its tough to compare the openness to investment between us and private companies because they are two very different types of investors but hopefully we are helping to validate the model for everyone.

AdExchanger.com: Looking back at the ad industry the past year, any surprising developments come to mind?

MK: The most surprising development was the hype around RTB, still way too early.

By John Ebbert

CPL Advertising Invading Brand Advertising Says Pontiflex CEO Lasker

Wednesday, December 16th, 2009

Zephrin Lasker is CEO and Co-founder of Pontiflex, a cost-per-lead marketplace.

PontiflexAdExchanger.com: Has performance marketing started to reach the brand marketer?

ZL: Definitely. When we started Pontiflex two years ago, we anticipated that most of our growth would come from direct response marketers. But surprisingly we have seen a very rapid adoption of Cost-per-Lead advertising by brand marketers who are looking for cost-efficient and scalable ways to connect with new consumers.

We’re seeing major brands like HUGGIES, Dell, Blackberry and others look to CPL advertising as a way to acquire marketing leads. I want to be clear here. When I say marketing leads, I mean the contact information of people who raise their hands to hear more from a specific brand – the kind of information you would collect off a landing page in a display or search campaign.

Our advertisers pay for these marketing leads on a performance, or Cost-per-Lead basis and then engage them in a variety of ways. As many as 51% of advertisers used community sites and social networking groups to engage consumers. This was closely followed by e-newsletter programs with special deals and offers.

So yes, as brand marketers begin to think about branding not as broadcasting, but as engagement, we will see more brand marketers use performance marketing to accomplish their objectives.

Please discuss the momentum for Pontiflex in the past year. What are the strengths? (verticals, pricing) Any weaknesses?

(more…)

Australian Publishers Looking To Retarget With Exchanges Says Funbox VP Childs-Eddy

Monday, December 7th, 2009

John Childs-Eddy is VP of Business Development at Australian direct response ad network, Funbox.

John Childs-Eddy of FunBoxAdExchanger.com: How is the Australian ad network business different than ad network businesses in other parts of the world?

JCE: It’s far less fragmented. The Australian market is essentially controlled by an oligopoly of a few main publishing players who work very hard to prevent what they see as the potential commoditization of their inventory.

Sales channel conflicts are far more common in Australia than in the domestic US market, and restrict the way inventory can be resold. For example: we have sat down with Yahoo7 (Australia’s Yahoo joint venture) several times this year – and have not yet found the right synergy to work through Yahoo’s Right Media platform to buy their inventory outside of a directly managed relationship (they do not have a demand link with any ad network in the exchange from what we’ve been told) – they explain this is because they do not have problems with domestic Australian demand. Their team also has what appears to be tremendous internal pressure on them to maintain the integrity of the campaigns they run (far more than the other Yahoo’s we work with) – which makes them understandably very cautious about opening up the Yahoo7 inventory “kimono.”

CTR’s are usually far lower here than in the US, and brand dollars play far more frequently, for a far higher percentage of the Australian inventory pie. This creates an interesting effect of allowing relatively under priced remnant CPM’s for DR campaigns with creative’s that perform well. This is because brand campaigns usually run with far lower metric goals than DR campaigns, and so the CTR expectations of the publishers cause them to price in a performance inefficiency that doesn’t usually exist with effective DR advertisers.

Even more interestingly, quite a few smaller Australian publishers still sell inventory on time-based metrics, instead of visitation-based metrics.

As a quirky side note which reflects the evolution of online display advertising in Australia, creative sizes here are still regularly described in archaic terminology such as “Leaderboard” or “Medium Rectangle”, instead of standard pixel size descriptions such as 728×90, or 300×250.

(more…)

Xtend Media CEO Orzel Says Ad Networks Will Need To Rely On Media Buying Skills To Survive

Friday, November 13th, 2009

Adi Orzel is CEO of Xtend Media, an online display advertising network.

Adi Orzel of Xtend- MediaAdExchanger.com: How will ad networks need to change to remain viable?

AO: I think that ad networks will need to rely much more on media buying, rather than developing their publisher networks, due to the fact that more and more publisher relationships will move outside from ad networks to exchanges and yield optimization platforms. As a result of that change they will also have a huge opportunity to put a bigger focus on the advertiser’s needs when running a campaign, rather than the inventory they own and need to sell. I see ad networks being the dominant buying force on exchanges and not the agencies. Agencies will move slowly when it come to non-guaranteed display inventory. I think it will be a challenge for them to adjust to this opportunity. The ad networks are there and ready to take it on with full force and all of their campaigns, and I believe they will continue to be a valuable player in the value chain between the ad exchanges and the agency / final advertiser.

Where does XTEND fit in the online advertising ecosystem?

XTEND is a global performance display ad network. We are part of an international performance marketing group called Adsmarket. As such we bring value to media companies and publishers by helping them monetize their international inventory even in the most remote markets. On the other front we focus on direct response advertisers that look for a network with a strong global marketing approach.

What’s your view on Demand side platforms?

(more…)

The Ad Network Is Dead – Oh Wait, InterCLICK Rings NASDAQ Opening Bell

Wednesday, November 11th, 2009

The ad network, InterCLICK (get the ICLK quote from CNN Money), which recently moved to the NASDAQ with its publicly-traded stock, rang today’s opening bell at the NASDAQ Market Site in New York City. Michael Mathews, CEO and Michael Katz, President and Founder of interCLICK, Inc., were among the lucky ringers.

InterCLICK

InterCLICK

The ad network model appears to be alive and well.

See more on the NASDAQ market site. Or, download the video of the InterClick team clapping its way through the open.

Tatto Media CEO Miao Says Ad Exchange Will Not Be Needed Someday

Wednesday, October 7th, 2009

Lin Miao is Chief Executive Officer of Tatto Media, an online advertising network.

Lin Miao of Tatto Media

AdExchanger.com: Tell us a little bit about Tatto Media. You position Tatto as an ad network, but during a recent panel at the ad:tech Chicago conference, you sounded more like a DR agency to me. What’s the story?

LM: Tatto Media is the third largest global advertising network (comScore, July 2009) and we are focused on performance campaigns. We tailor to advertisers that are familiar with direct response already and who are seeking a larger, more global audience in addition to requiring next generation behavioral tools that enables them to segment leads more accurately.

What momentum are you seeing on the client-side today?

We currently cater to more than 1,000 advertisers that fall specifically in the following categories: Finance, Education, Entertainment and Insurance. These clients are usually well-versed in direct response and are constantly looking for more accuracy and quality in the delivery of leads, larger scale and complete global presence.

Tatto Media was founded in 2005 and since then we believed that behavioral targeting should exist as a support tool specifically for direct response and not for brands. As more direct response agencies and networks enter the space, it is imperative that large advertising networks focus on technologies that can improve lead quality. Behavioral targeting makes sense in assisting advertisers to reach a higher quality of an audience and thus should increase conversions.

(more…)

VideoEgg Focuses On Performance Pricing Model As Rich Media Ad Network Revenues Double Says CEO Sanchez

Monday, October 5th, 2009

Matt Sanchez is CEO of VideoEgg, a rich media advertising network.

Videoegg CEO Matt SanchezAdExchanger.com: Can you give us a sense of current momentum at VideoEgg? Any effects from the economy? Have clients changed their buying strategies?

MS: We are delighted about the traction we are getting. 2008 revenue was up 110%. This year we are up more than a 100%. While we are seeing softness in some sectors, advertisers are clearly enthusiastic about Cost-Per-Engagement (CPE), the performance pricing approach we pioneered, and the richness of the advertising experiences that VideoEgg offers. We’re also continuing to enhance our targeting capabilities and this too, is driving our business growth.

Are advertisers using social media profiles or social graph effectively to target consumers with ads on the web today? If not, how far away are we?

At the most basic level, social media is providing the industry with a source of demographic and interest data that did not previously exist. This data is being utilized widely by publishers and networks. A number of companies are experimenting with relationship data as a basis for targeting, but it is too early to tell how this will affect brand advertising. On the other hand, there are other companies using social data to customize the ad experience. So far, though, this approach has received pretty negative reactions from consumers.

(more…)

Rocket Fuel CEO John Says Ad Exchanges More Like A Technology Platform Than Media Source

Monday, August 24th, 2009

George John is CEO of Rocket Fuel, Inc., an online advertising network.

Rocket Fuel CEO George JohnAdExchanger.com: How do you see the role of the ad network evolving over the next 12-24 months? Will ad network arbitrage disappear?

It has been hyped that the ad network marketplace is overly crowded with more than 400 players. But when you take a closer look at the market in detail, of these supposed 400 networks, 370+ are small niche buyers and vertical content aggregators that act as basic service providers to make buying media a little easier for agencies and advertisers. The remaining 25 or so aren’t really data targeting companies but rather inventory aggregators who basically sell pre-defined profiles or “buckets” of impressions and call them customer “segments.” Many of the traditional players are only scalable through efficient operations, not technology. There are actually very few companies with real technology platforms and intelligent systems that help them make sophisticated and insightful targeting decisions in real time.

Because of the existing climate, over the next 12-24 months, we feel the ecosystem will go through rapid change and the data-inventory value creators (those that can make sense of and understand the value of all types of data online), not the content aggregators, will be the winners.

(more…)

Bizo CEO Russell Glass Says Data Driving B2B Demand-Side Optimization, Too

Monday, August 17th, 2009

Russell Glass is CEO of Bizo, a business-to-business ad network.

Bizo CEO Russell GlassAdExchanger.com: Judging from your June release, Bizo business appears to have momentum. Has B2B been slowed in the recession or never stopped? What are you expecting from the economy in the next 12 months?

B2B has been hurt by the recession, but it has kept pace with the rest of the industry and its projected to take an increasingly larger share of the overall online advertising pie in future years. We call it a high-growth $4 billion business, but I’ve seen numbers placing it at over $5 billion for 2009 with steady, 15-20% growth over the next 12 months and beyond.

How is Bizo differentiating itself from other B2B ad networks? Is it technology or service? Please explain.

We like to think it’s both. We work very hard to provide the best possible service and results to our advertisers, but our main differentiator is our technology. Our platform collects data from our B2B publishing partners and other company information sources, and we then organize and anonymize that data to create bizographic profiles that include such features as job function, industry, company size and seniority level. We’re then able to use that data to target advertising across our growing B2B network without compromising individual online privacy. It’s a proven model – it provides better results at better rates than competing offerings – and it’s all dependent on the strength of our technology and the strength of our network.

(more…)

AdRoll Offering A Targeting Platform To Advertisers Says CEO Bell

Thursday, August 6th, 2009

AdrollAaron Bell is CEO of AdRoll, an online co-operative, advertising network.

AdExchanger.com: What’s been happening at AdRoll lately? Recession effects?

While we’ve dialed down some of our own costs (ahem – postponing the order for the office 72” plasma screen to showcase our world domination metrics), we’ve actually seen double-digit monthly growth despite the dour economic climate. This is likely because Adroll is focused on delivering tangible ROI for brands targeting hard to reach niche and enthusiast audiences.

In this economy, advertisers are looking for alternatives to premium ad buys. Adroll offers a cost effective way to access the same audiences available via premium buys by making sense of non-premium inventory. Our platform shines in its ability to “roll up” highly-targeted inventory found on niche sites and blogs. We determine the best placements for a brand by evaluating traditional metrics alongside peer recommendations we collect from publishers in the advertiser’s “in-crowd”. This data provides us with unique insights as to which sites are the most relevant and highly regarded within a niche, and allows us to make intelligent media recommendations that are richer than merely advertising across a vertical or keyword. In fact, we’ve seen a 3x greater click-through rate on campaigns run against the highest rated sites vs. a category at large.

Additionally, Adroll allows brands to extend beyond the banner, generating coverage and buzz on relevant niche sites and blogs through our promotion tools. We’ve recognized that many brands expend considerable energy compiling lists of blogs and contacts followed by reaching out to these sites with PR materials. Leveraging our recommendation technology, Adroll makes it easy and cost effective to pinpoint and communicate with sites and blogs appropriate for your brand.

How do you position AdRoll – as an ad network, vertical ad network(s)? What challenge is the company’s product solving?

(more…)

Inflection Point Media Seeing Shift Toward Targeted Vertical Ad Network Model Says CEO Hulse

Tuesday, July 21st, 2009

Inflection Point MediaChris Hulse is CEO of Inflection Point Media, a business-to-business ad network.

Any current trends that you can share in Inflection Point Media’s B2B ad network business – strengths, weaknesses? And, have publisher CPMs cratered like they have in the B2C world?

Inflection Point Media’s complete focus on the SMB market has been our strength. In a recession, marketers are looking for efficient ways to put the right message in front of the right prospect at exactly the right time. That’s what we do at IPM. We do this by networking over 140, highly focused SMB sites and search engines. We are able to identify key “inflection points” by the type of keyword search or targeted browsing an SMB does on these sites. By valuing the audience and monetizing it off site, we generate incremental revenue for our publishers in a non-cannibalizing way.

Publishers are struggling right now. Downward pressure on CPMs in a recession is a fact of life, though the B2B vertical is a bit more buoyant than the more general B2C world. Publishers that have great content, provide real value to their users and have tight control over their own inventory will always do best in down times. We see that first hand with the publishers we work with. It’s tough out there and that’s why we believe we launched our company at exactly the right time.

For publishers, how do you increase their revenues without cannibalizing sales? Isn’t channel conflict inevitable?

(more…)

CSO Schanzer of Undertone Networks Says Online Metrics Today Don’t Support Long Term Needs Of A Brand

Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009

Alan Schanzer of Undertone NetworksAlan Schanzer is Chief Strategy Officer, Undertone Networks, an online advertising network.

AdExchanger.com: Of the four ad solutions you provide according to your website (Display Ads, Synched Ads, Undertone Video and Full Page Ads), which is the fastest growing and why? Any surprises or trends that you’ve seen in 2009?

AS: We are seeing growth in most of our higher impact units including all forms of video, rich media and a new product which allows a user to connect an ad or offer directly to a mobile device, Web based calendar, Twitter stream or social media environment. This growth is being driven by brand and direct response marketers who seek both impact and performance and are interested in experimenting online beyond the basic banners with units that have TV characteristics (site, sound, motion) but aren’t necessarily a replication of TV creative.

In a recent Advertising Age article, it was noted that Undertone will refund a campaign as much as $50,000 if impression quality slips. How do you determine quality? Please provide an example. Have you made any refunds yet?

(more…)

CSO Schanzer of Undertone Networks Says Online Metrics Today Don't Support Long Term Needs Of A Brand

Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009

Alan Schanzer of Undertone NetworksAlan Schanzer is Chief Strategy Officer, Undertone Networks, an online advertising network.

AdExchanger.com: Of the four ad solutions you provide according to your website (Display Ads, Synched Ads, Undertone Video and Full Page Ads), which is the fastest growing and why? Any surprises or trends that you’ve seen in 2009?

AS: We are seeing growth in most of our higher impact units including all forms of video, rich media and a new product which allows a user to connect an ad or offer directly to a mobile device, Web based calendar, Twitter stream or social media environment. This growth is being driven by brand and direct response marketers who seek both impact and performance and are interested in experimenting online beyond the basic banners with units that have TV characteristics (site, sound, motion) but aren’t necessarily a replication of TV creative.

In a recent Advertising Age article, it was noted that Undertone will refund a campaign as much as $50,000 if impression quality slips. How do you determine quality? Please provide an example. Have you made any refunds yet?

(more…)

CEO Wright Says Endemic and Non-Endemic Advertisers Coming To DogTime Media

Wednesday, June 17th, 2009

Trevor Wright of DogTime MediaTrevor Wright is CEO of DogTime Media.

AdExchanger.com: Does Adify still provide the technology “backbone” of Dogtime? How has that relationship evolved?

DogTime leveraged Adify’s technology backbone to launch our vertical community, but quickly evolved beyond their capabilities and have been independent of Adify for more than a year.

Are advertisers buying from DogTime Media to target the “dog lovers” vertical, if you will, or are advertisers targeting audience with other, less endemic objectives, too?

DogTime has been successful in attracting not just endemic advertisers that want to reach passionate pet enthusiasts, but also with non-endemic advertisers who are targeting highly engaged women between the ages of 25-54, such as 20th Century Fox, Paramount, Toyota, Chronicle Books, Bissell, Eureka, Harper Collins, Dyson, etc.

Describe the revenue share. Does it vary according to publisher and advertiser format (widget vs. standard display)?

(more…)

Retargeting Continues The Conversation for Brand Marketers Says FetchBack CEO Chad Little

Wednesday, June 10th, 2009

FetchBackChad Little is CEO of FetchBack, a retargeting company.

AdExchanger.com: From your blog, I see that you’ve delivered $64.5 million in revenue for your clients – is that in the past two years? Care to elaborate in terms of net revenues to FetchBack, average deal size, type of clients, etc.?

No – that’s ($64.5 million) a partial record of the total value we’ve provided over the time period. When we first started the company we didn’t implement the tracking of this figure.

We’ll charge on a CPM but we prefer to work with all of our clients on a CPA or Revenue Share basis. The averages depend on the product offering or lead being generated. It’s safe to say that it ranges from the low side of 5% to as high as 20% per sale/lead.

What trends are you seeing in the marketplace?

A continual push to performance marketing. As those in the industry are aware, this is the dominant form of marketing on the net but given the current conditions it makes sense. Given that, the trend (or should I say issue) that all marketers are dealing with is the need for a more robust solution for attribution issues. Something that’s independent of the ad networks and server solutions.

How do you differentiate yourself from companies like Platform-A’s Leadback and any ad network that offers retargeting?

(more…)

Collective Media CEO Apprendi Says 2009 Is About Audience-centric Buying and Bigger, Richer Media

Monday, June 8th, 2009

Collective MediaJoe Apprendi is CEO of Collective Media.

AdExchanger.com: Any trends/momentum you can share in your display ad business?

JA: There are two major trends that developed in 2008 and are really accelerating in 2009. The first is the shift from site-specific to audience-centric buying among brand advertisers. Agencies/Advertisers are realizing there are many ways to reach a target audience beyond conventional site/section targeting. Second, in response to this trend, there is a greater emphasis among brand-name publishers to create bigger, richer ad units to increase the effectiveness of ad creative beyond standard IAB ad sizes. Not only will this continue, it is a critical ingredient to the success of a display ad campaign.

How is technology impacting the online ad network space?

Ad technology is at the core of the most successful ad networks. Of the 400+ ad networks, 90% of them have no proprietary, differentiated technology. In fact, many simply provide services on top of existing ad exchanges. I believe that the market is recognizing the ad network players who are providing a meaningful platform that increases the effectiveness of their display advertising spend. This includes audience targeting, yield management and ad effectiveness analytics.

What will bring the brand awareness dollars online in a way that matches the time spent on the Web by the consumer?

(more…)